Comparison of Patients Discharged to Skilled Nursing and Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities After Hospitalization for COVID-19: A Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to identify differences in demographics, severity of disease, and rates of hospital readmission among adults discharged to skilled nursing facilities and inpatient rehabilitation facilities after hospitalization for coronavirus 2019. DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of adults hospitalized with coronavirus 2019 infection at academic medical centers participating in the Vizient Clinical Data Base between April 1, 2020, and June 30, 2021, who were discharged to skilled nursing facilities or inpatient rehabilitation facilities ( N = 39,882). Data from the Clinical Data Base are used with permission of Vizient, Inc. All rights reserved. RESULTS: Among adults hospitalized with coronavirus 2019 infection, those discharged to skilled nursing facilities were 1.4 times more likely to require hospital readmission than those discharged to inpatient rehabilitation facilities. They were, on average, older (73 vs. 61 yrs, P < 0.001) and had shorter hospital lengths of stay (15 vs. 26 days, P < 0.0001) than the patients discharged to inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Persons discharged to inpatient rehabilitation facilities were more likely to have received intensive care and mechanical ventilation while hospitalized ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals discharged to inpatient rehabilitation facilities after hospitalization for coronavirus 2019 differ from those discharged to skilled nursing facilities on a number of key variables, including age, hospital length of stay, having received intensive care, and odds of hospital readmission.

Virtually Possible: Medical Student Rehabilitation Rotations During a Pandemic.

ABSTRACT: The novel coronavirus 2019 pandemic has led to new dilemmas in medical education because of an initial shortage of personal protective equipment, uncertainty regarding disease transmission and treatments, travel restrictions, and social distancing guidelines. These new problems further compound the already existing problem of limited medical student exposure to the field of physical medicine and rehabilitation, particularly for students in medical schools lacking a department of physical medicine and rehabilitation, approximately 50% of medical schools. A virtual medical student physical medicine and rehabilitation rotation was created to mitigate coronavirus 2019-related limitations and impact on medical education. Using audiovisual technology, students had the opportunity to participate in clinical inpatient and outpatient care, live-streamed procedures, and virtual didactics, develop and showcase their clinical knowledge and reasoning skills, and become familiar with the culture of the physical medicine and rehabilitation residency program. Adaptive educational approaches, including integration of the flipped classroom model, success, pitfalls, and areas for improvement will be described and discussed. Providing nontraditional methods for physical medicine and rehabilitation education and exposure to medical students is crucial to maintain and promote growth of the field in this unprecedented and increasingly virtual era.